GAAP vs NON GAAP You hear a lot about earnings reports provided by companies that are based on criteria the companies created, usually trying to present the results in more favorable light (should I say “huge favorable light”). I also read that it is becoming more prevalent. They just don’t want you to see it in the bottom line. There is an explanation for all big losses. The reporting in SEC filings are suppose to be in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) (as I understand it), a uniform accounting presentation. So, when we see all this info on Per/Share on Yahoo, Bloomberg, Morningstar, I’m never sure if the it is the company info or what. To the point: is Stock Rover info from other sources GAAP or non-GAAP?
Agree that is it becoming a bigger problem. Stock Rover reports GAAP for all its financial data. Note that the Analyst Future Earnings Estimate data is Non-GAAP as that is how the analysts do it.
That is very interesting. Do you have any references I could look at to pursue that topic? (Analysts estimates being based on Non-GAAP data) Thanks in advance.
Hi Laurie, We don’t have any additional Stock Rover resources about that but this article is a good resource on the topic. Let us know if you have any other questions! http://www.buriedvalue.com/stock-market/understanding-sp-500-earnings-estimates/
unfortunately for new-economy companies like Amazon & Netflix & Tesla , you can’t/shouldn’t judge your buy/sell investment decision making on earnings, but on revenues… at least for the last ten years… PJS
Many earnings reports report a second number “after special items” what are these? And are they significant? It seems we should evaluate earnings including special items.
Definitely want to evaluate earnings reports including special items. That is why it is important to evaluate by the GAAP numbers which Stock Rover does, rather than the non-GAAP numbers which the company prefers because they are usually more favorable.